Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc



Because so many of men’s gender role problems would be solved if most women were FIPs (financially independent persons).

Traditional women (i.e. fluffies – traditional women who expect to be able to parasite off the money of a man, i.e. some manslave, some robot male, to pay for a fluffie to live in a middle class house and raise her kids in, all paid for by him) are parasites. They manslave men and live off their money.

Now that women can work (thanks to the contraceptive pill, higher education for women, household gadgets etc) WOMEN MUST WORK. Anything else is parasitism on men’s labor.

When nearly all women are FIPs, then manslavery dies out. It is no longer needed because women are FIPs and make their own money. These FIP women are strongly motivated to get a good FIP major education, at high school and university, so that they can get good, well-paying jobs as adults, and pull their own financial weight, and not look to men to pay for them.

When nearly all women are FIPs, then men will get the Parer (paternity rejection right) the lack of which in today’s world is probably the most blatant example of sexual discrimination against men. Women have a legislated Marer (maternity rejection right) commonly called the abortion right, but men have no Parer. So a woman can reject an unwanted pregnancy, but men cant, so men can have their lives ruined by a woman who decides to continue a pregnancy unwanted by him, then slam him with a paternity suit and ruin his life.

With nearly all women as FIPs, men will be able to bring in the Parer law, so that if a woman continues with a pregnancy that she wants, that he doesn’t, then she is legally obliged to pay full costs of the child after its born. The father will be able to go to a local JP (justice of the peace) and sign a “paternity rejection form” before the pregnancy is too advanced, so that the mother knows about it and must then make a decision. She may decide that without a man to help her with the costs of the child, she decides to abort. But if she is a real FIP, she will probably have enough money to support the child on her own, and if she really wants the child, then she can go ahead with the pregnancy to full term, knowing that she can afford to pay for the cost of bringing up the child (which is about $200,000 in the US).

With most women FIPs, the whole mentality of women regarding men will change. In today’s world, women still see men largely as disposable check books, I.e. as exploitable payers of women to have kids. Even most feminists are still fluffies when it comes to men. Fluffie feminists have had their feminist consciousness raised, but not their masculist/MGTOW consciousness raised, so by default they still have traditional female attitudes (i.e. fluffie attitudes) towards men.

With most women FIPs, women will feel morally and culturally obliged to pull their weight financially and not parasite on a man. The masculists (far more so that the MGTOWs) put enormous moral pressure on women to be FIPs, and punish them if they aren’t, by refusing to have relationships with them, forcing them to rot on the shelf to extinction.

The primary political goal of the masculists is to wipe out fluffiedom, to wipe out manslavery. The masculist attitude is “manslavery is slavery, slavery is a war issue, the masculists are at war against the fluffies, whom the masculists push to see rot on the shelf to extinction, by refusing to have relationships with them – punishing them for being the immoral, parasitic, manslaving vermin that these fluffies are.

The masculists are far more politically active than the MGTOWs (men going their own way, refusing to marry and have kids, spending their money on themselves). MGTOWs are political to some extend, but its a slow method. MGTOWs simply remove themselves from the marriage and paternity market, thus crashing the birthrate and the size of the population, wiping it out in a mere century. Sooner or later the male feminist gender politicians will be FORCED TO MENFAIR THE GENDER LAWS, e.g. especially regarding the massive injustice committed daily in the fluffie feminist dominated divorce courts, and the lack of the Parer etc.

Masculists actively aim to educate society into masculist/MGTOW ideas, by for example, approaching the broadcast media, by setting up men’s lib groups at high schools and universities, lobbying the gender politicians, etc. For example, in my own case as a masculist, having now written 50 of these fliers (this one is the 50th) I send out links to my MGTOW-masculist-resource-flyers website to the major MGTOW/masculist/MRA/feminist sites etc and to the major US/UK newspapers hoping the journalists will latch on. Some of the male journalists will have had the negative experience of being financially massacred in the fluffie feminist controlled divorce courts and will be open to masculist/MGTOW ideas.

The main goal of the masculists is to change the mentality of women, putting enormous moral pressure on them to be FIPs, or they don’t get a man. “Be FIP or be manless!” “Fluffies can rot on the shelf!” “Fluffies are immoral, parasitic, manslaving vermin!” “Rather a FIP than a fluffie!”

As the masculist/MGTOW ideas really disseminate throughout society, women will be influenced by these ideas and be frightened. A lot of them already know that in the US 70% of young men under 35 refuse to marry and have kids, so that the odds of a young woman having a baby now is only 1 in 3. In a decade it may be 1 in 10, as the MGTOW/masculist rejection of fatherhood spreads and spreads due to the toxicity of the divorce courts.

Masculists harangue women, putting moral pressure on them to reject their (genetically evolved) attitudes of looking on men as exploitable checkbooks. Masculism/MGTOW is countering women’s nature, forcing women to be FIPs, or they are strongly punished, by not getting a man, and thus forced to live manless, lonely, loveless, often sexless, babyless, poor, lives.

Masculists are aiming to set up a cultural ethic of women being FIPs, to such an extent, that it becomes the unconscious cultural norm. Later this century, young women will look upon the idea of fluffiedom with the same degree of contempt and horror as we today look upon the idea of negro slavery. These young women will agree with the masculists that manslavery is slavery, and should be abolished. They too, like the masculists and MGTOWs will be 21st century abolitionists, i.e. pushing for the abolition of manslavery by “womaning up” to be FIPs, i.e. civilized women, civilized, responsible, adult, human beings.


Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis


%d bloggers like this: