profhugodegaris

Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc

MASCULISTING the MGTOWs

MASCULISTING the MGTOWs

Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis

profhugodegaris@yahoo.com

https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com

 

This flyer presents the main arguments why passive apolitical MGTOWs should convert themselves into politically active masculists, to greatly increase their effectiveness as men’s libbers.

I think the time is now ripe for a mass conversion of MGTOWs to masculism. This flyer explains why, giving the reasons why I think the path is now clear on how masculists should proceed.

I will begin by putting up the MGTOW strawman that I intend to shoot down, so that those MGTOWs who strongly believe the strawman arguments will be given something serious to think about, if my arguments are persuasive.

The main argument (in my view) of the MGTOWs against not being masculists, i.e. politically active men’s libbers, is the “51% female voter argument” of TFM (Turd Flinging Monkey), who is one of the smartest of the MGTOWs, who is one of the MGTOWs I listen to every day (along with Sandman, John of MGTOW is Freedom, Angry MGTOW, MGTOW101, and others, but less frequently.)

TFM’s argument goes as follows. I think you’ll find it rather persuasive at face value. “There is no point being a politically active masculist or MRA (a men’s rights activist), pushing for reform of the gender laws in favor of men, because women are 51% of the voters, and even worse, women vote at a higher rate than men, so when it comes to a zero sum game type reform of the gender laws, e.g. bringing in joint custody of kids after a divorce, or the Parer (paternity rejection right) then what men will gain, women will lose, so it will be in women’s self interest to bloc vote to keep the gender law status quo. Even if all men vote for menfairing the gender laws, they will always be outvoted by the female bloc vote.

TFM strongly believes this, stating it regularly on his YouTube shows. But it can be refuted by a masculist argument, that then makes politically active masculism a reasonable option, so that millions of men who are currently passive apolitical MGTOWs, can convert themselves into being politically active masculists, who then show real solidarity with other men who are suffering the same gender related problems as they are.

Here is the counter argument. “OK, women are 51% of the voters, but if the masculists can persuade a sizable proportion of women to become female masculists, then that figure could be lowered to say 40%, implying a combined vote percentage (male bloc vote + female masculist bloc vote) of 60%.

That 60% figure would force the gender politicians to change their minds and bring in menfair gender laws, because if they don’t, they would be voted out, that is the nature of democracy.

The next step in the argument is to ask, “How to persuade women to become female masculists, especially when it comes to menfairing the divorce courts?”

Women like the divorce law status quo. It is very nice to women. In a typical divorce, the woman gets sole custody of the kids. She gets the ex-husband’s house, child support from him, half his possessions, and often if the ex-wife is a real fluffie (a traditional woman who expects to be able to parasite off the money of a man) and career incompetent, she may get alimony from him for life.

The above list is such a good deal for women, why on earth would they want to give it up for the sake of menfairing the gender laws? Why indeed?

It is at this point in the argument that I got stuck, until recently, feeling logically forced to agree with TFM’s reasoning, until I had an epiphany, which I believe changes everything. Here is the new idea.

What would be more important to women than the above benefits in a divorce, i.e. getting all those goodies at her ex-husbands expense? Answer – to be able to continue having babies.

My idea was that the masculists could threaten women, frighten them, by telling them about MGTOW and its boycott of paternity. Young women increasingly nowadays are finding that young quality males refuse to give them their sperm, so that young women are really starting to panic now. They are becoming increasingly conscious that they truly are not going to have a baby!

What the masculists need to do (once they have got their ideas onto the broadcast media, so that masculist ideas can spread to the masses, the millions) is to preach the message to women that if they don’t vote with men in favor of menfairing the gender laws, then women will continue to remain babyless, due to the MGTOW paternity boycott.

Masculists should be arguing to young women, “If you young women, don’t become female masculists, and vote with men in favor of menfairing the gender laws, e.g. menfairing the divorce laws, bringing in the Parer, etc., then the masculists and MGTOWs will continue to boycott paternity, and you will continue to not have babies. We men have the power to force you to be babyless.”

Most women care more about having babies than getting divorce court goodies from ex-husbands, so masculists have the upper hand in this situation. We are able to FORCE women to become female masculists, who vote in favor of the menfairing of the gender laws, thus refuting TFM’s “51% female voter” argument.

As MGTOW ideas spread and spread, as more men wake up to the horrible toxicity of the divorce courts, taken over by the hated feminazis, ruining the lives of one married father in four in the western countries, it is only a question of time before the broadcast media latch on to the phenomenon and see it for what it is, i.e. not a fringy movement, but a social phenomenon that will prove to be as historic for men, as feminism was for women in the 70s.

Once the media people truly understand the importance of what the masculists and MGTOWs are doing and thinking, they will give the MGTOW/masculist ideas wide coverage. In time, everyone will have heard of MGTOW and masculism.

Once that happens, the masculists will be able to preach to women the importance of FIPping up, i.e. becoming FIPs (financially independent persons) by bothering to get a career competent education in high school, rejecting the “soft option” i.e. the intellectually easy, intellectually lazy option of e.g. English literature, language, history etc. in the final years of high school and hence more “fluffie crap” majors at college, so that these fluffie crapper women end up with a fluffie crap diploma that the economy does not value so that these fluffie crapper women end up earning low salaries.

These fluffie crapper women then start looking around for some manslave to parasite upon to pay for the house she wants to raise her kids in when she gets baby rabies in her 30s when her biological clock really starts ticking.

Once the masculists really have the ear of the broadcast media, they will be able to push the idea onto women, that if they don’t bother to become FIPs, they will be rejected by men. The masculists won’t even pump and dump fluffies, so strong is their antagonism against them.

The masculists have sayings regarding their contempt for fluffies, whom masculists see as the enemy, to be wiped out, not killed, just ignored to extinction, rotting on the shelf, utterly ignored by men, punished by men for being “immoral parasitic manslaving vermin” to be spat on. Some of these sayings are – “Be FIP or be manless!” “No calculus, no baby!” “Fluffies rot on the shelf!”

Masculists see MGTOW as a subset of masculist ideology. Masculists use MGTOW tactics i.e. boycotting marriage and paternity as a very useful tool to force women to do what the masculists want, i.e. as a component of masculist social engineering.

Masculists are strong moralizers. They place heavy moral pressure on women to FIP up or not get a man, and use the MGTOW boycott of marriage and paternity as the stick to beat women with, forcing women to do what the masculists want, i.e. the FIPping of women, and the menfairing of the gender laws.

The masculists place enormous importance on the concept of the FIP, of the FIPing of women. Why is that? Because the masculists have a political, social, psychological vision that they call the creation of a “FIP Society” i.e. a society in which both sexes, particularly girls, are socialized by parents and educated by teachers to be FIPs, i.e. to get career competent educations in high school and college, so that they can become real FIPs as adults, and not expect to parasite off the money of a man, i.e. to become a fluffie, so hated by the masculists.

Why do the masculists emphasize the FIPping of women so much? Because with nearly all women FIPs (unlike the three quarters of young women today at age 16 who choose to study the soft option, i.e. fluffie crap subjects at high school) then nearly all of the gender problems that men have today would be removed, e.g. the divorce laws could be much more easily menfaired, because women would be FIPs and could afford not to be given alimony, so that the house remains with the original owner(s), so that custody of the kids is automatically made joint, since the ex-wife has a career and will continue with it, who prefers to have joint custody, so that she does not have to look after the kids full time.

The Parer can be brought in. The lack of a Parer (paternity rejection right) for men, is one of the most blatant forms of sexual discrimination that exists, given that women have a legislated Marer (maternity rejection right) aka abortion right.

Women have the right to reject an unwanted pregnancy, but men don’t, so millions of women “accidently” get pregnant against the wishes of their boyfriends and husbands, and then slam a paternity suit on him, forcing him to pay for a kid that he does not want. This is criminal behavior by these fluffie women.

The masculists push for the legislation of the Parer very hard, because it will truly free men from manslavery, i.e. working as a salaried slave for a woman, so that the woman can sit on her fat arse and raise her kids in a house that he pays for.

Fluffies are terrified of the concept of the Parer, maybe even more so than the idea of not being able to have babies due to the paternity boycott of the MGTOWs. Bringing in the Parer will FORCE women to grow up, to take responsibility for their own lives, particularly their financial lives. Women will be forced to give up their self-image of being privileged, pampered, princesses.

The masculists will push the idea on the media that a fluffie can only be a fluffie is she can get her financial claws into some gullible manslave, but thanks to the influence of the ideas of the MGTOWs and masculists, the supply of such gullible manslaves is drying up.

In many leading western countries today, already some two thirds of young men under 35 refuse to marry, refuse to have kids and spend their money on themselves. As the knowledge of the toxicity of the fluffie feminist hypocrite dominated divorce courts keeps spreading amongst young men, that percentage will go over 90% and very few young women will be having babies. This will put women into a real panic.

The masculists will push women very hard to be FIPs or fluffie women will be spat at. Masculists harangue fluffies, treating them as vermin, as the immoral manslaving parasites they are. Masculists will quickly get the reputation on the broadcast media of being very harsh on fluffies, not tolerating them, treating them as pariahs, to be utterly rejected by men.

This will force women to listen, and they will be afraid to not be FIPs. They will learn that if they don’t bother to get a career competent education to become a real FIP as an adult, then their reward, actually their punishment, is that they will be rejected by men. They will be spat at for being hated fluffies.

From the above, one sees that there are essentially two core ideas that the masculists can use to free men from manslavery, i.e. the idea of pushing women to become female masculists in the sense of voting with men to force the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws, and the second is that women have to become FIPs and pull their own financial weight, not expecting to parasite off the money of a man, fluffie style, or be punished by men, by not getting one.

We men have the power, the means, to achieve both of these goals, i.e. the FIPping of women, and the menfairing of the gender laws. Nearly all men are FIPs. We are socialized that way, and actually evolved to be that way, since we evolved to manipulate and understand the world, whereas women evolved to be baby factories and child minders, and to manipulate men, so that women could be more effective parasites on men.

But the contraceptive pill changed all that. Now that women can reliably choose to have their 0, 1, or 2 kids, they have a career window of some 40 years, so that the masculists justifiably point the finger at women, as say very sternly “Now that you women can work, you must work. Anything else is parasitism off the labor of men. As masculists we are fed up with working for women. You will FIP up, or you will starve. You become responsible adults, pulling your own financial weight, or we men will wipe you out by ignoring you to death! We masculists have a hatred of fluffies.”

I hope you have found the above arguments convincing, and that they motivate you, if you are a MGTOW, to convert yourself to become a masculist, and then join with other masculists to become politically active. There is so much to do.

For example, masculist/MGTOW groups need to be set up in every high school and college, to exert strong moral pressure on fluffie students to FIP up.

The broadcast media needs to be educated into MGTOW/masculist ideas, so that the journalists spread these ideas to the masses.

Men’s studies courses need to be established at universities, and text books on men’s issue need to be written. I, for example, intend to write a book, using the ideas from my 240+ YouTube flyers on masculist and MGTOW themes that I have already written and filmed. I will entitle it probably “Masculism : Men’s Lib : The Rebellion by Men against Working for Women.”

The masculists need to so sway public opinion in favor of menfairing the gender laws, that the gender politicians feel enormous political pressure to do it.

Masculists can put strong critical moral pressure on the feminazis, accusing them of indirectly becoming genociders, due to their takeover of the divorce courts, making them so toxic that young men refuse to marry and refuse to have kids, which is wiping out whole populations.

Masculists will be able to educate the public that women don’t have a monopoly on gender issues. Women oppress men too. One married father in four is being routinely financially massacred in the hated feminazi controlled divorce courts. This massive injustice has to stop, hence the masculists will push society hard in the media, that woman must FIP up (so that the gender laws can be much more easily menfaired) or they will become manless, loveless, sexless, babyless, poor, and spat at.

So, guys, if you are currently a passive, apolitical, MGTOW, and you like the above ideas, then consider converting yourself into a politically active masculist, and get busy. There is so much to do, to liberate men from manslavery, worldwide, this century, which is the main political goal of the masculists.

Cheers,

Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis

profhugodegaris@yahoo.com

https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com

(YouTube channels) “de Garis Masculist MGTOW Flyers”  “de Garis Essays”

%d bloggers like this: