Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc
A REGENDERING PLAN
A REGENDERING PLAN
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
This flyer is ambitious. Its goal is to find a way to reorganize the gender roles so that they are fair to men, to women, and affordable to the state, so that the primary aim is met that whole populations are not wiped out as is currently happening under the current gender roles. Things have to change.
One of my favorite MGTOWs, to whom I listen every day is TFM (Turd Flinging Monkey) who makes the point forcefully, that western societies are wiping themselves out by crashing the birth rate to well under replacement rate, due to the fact that women have careers, choose to establish them first, then run out of fertile years, so that they typically end up with only one kid.
TFM’s draconian solution, is for men to take away women’s rights and force them back to being mothers, so that our populations are not wiped out. I don’t agree with TFM’s solution, which strikes me as being too authoritarian and dictatorial, (for example, if he tried to impose women’s rightslessness on my sister, she would kill him) but he has made me more conscious of the problem.
Something has to be done, because the current set of gender roles are not working. In fact, they are catastrophically not working, because in countries like Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan, etc, the current birthrate is about 1.3 children per woman, compared to the replacement rate of 2.1
So, this flyer tosses out ideas, suggestions on how to solve this awful problem, without oppressing neither men nor women. How to do this?
As a masculist, I put enormous emphasis on the importance of women pulling their financial weight, so the masculists need to push young women to FIP up, i.e. bother to get a career competent education so that they can become FIPs (financially independent persons) as adults and not expect to be a fluffie (who expects to be able to parasite off a man’s money, so that she can stay at home in his house that he pays for, raising her kids).
The divorce laws must be made menfair so that men are prepared to be fathers again, and not face a one in four risk of being financially massacred in the fluffie feminist hypocrite dominated divorce court system.
So as a piece of social engineering, what steps need to be undertaken, to encourage women to have more kids, so that the birth rate returns to over 2.1?
How about this?! Change the social norms, such that both sexes equally, are socialized by parents and educated by teachers to be FIPs, getting a career competent education, to become FIPs as adults.
Encourage women to get their university degree and then work for a few years in their career, so that they know what careering is about. By the time they are about 25-27, they then have 2 children. (Few women will want to have more, since each kid in the US costs the parents about $200,000 each.)
The government gives the couple a hefty child subsidy, to encourage them to have two kids. The first subsidy is a substantial amount, and for the second child it is a lot more.
The government sets up a Swedish style child care center system, so that couples can leave their young kids in a competently run day care center, so that both of them can work, when the children are still toddlers.
Schools are organized, so that they become child minders till parents get home from work. With both the mother and father as FIPs, the total income should be enough for them to work reasonable hours, say 8 or less per day, so that the kids are not orphaned in the school.
Parents need to be taught by the society, that divorce harms the children, to encourage those fragile marriages that are not so intolerable, that they stay together for the sake of the kids.
When there is a divorce, then custody of the kids is joint automatically, so that men will not be motivated to reject marriage as is very much the case today, given the awful toxicity of marriage in today’s world, due to the hated feminazi bitches who financially massacre men in the divorce courts that the feminazis control.
If the woman does not bother to get a career competent education, then in the case of a divorce, the law should be similar to what happens in China, i.e. custody of the kids goes to the father, because he has the money to take care of them.
This Chinese style logic will encourage fluffie women to FIP up if they want to get their children back half time. For fluffie women who are thinking of divorcing, the prospect of losing custody of their kids, will motivate them not to divorce, and to make more effort to FIP up.
The government can advertise that it is the patriotic duty of parents to have two kids, not one. It is better for the first kid, because he/she will have a sibling to play with. It is obviously better for the whole population, because it does not die out.
Where will all the money come from to pay for the hefty subsidies to encourage parents to have 2 kids, to pay for the daycare centers, etc? From extra taxes, e.g. “singles taxes” i.e. those people who choose to be childless, are forced to play their part in creating the next generation, so that populations don’t get wiped out.
Governments can exert moral pressure on singles, so that the single person understands, that his/her individual decision to not be a parent, when multiplied by millions of people in a country, has macro consequences, i.e. the population dies out, which would be a catastrophe.
Governments can educate women that recent research shows that women who don’t have kids are usually miserable. Women evolved to have lots of kids. Practice shows that women are happiest on the whole when they are surrounded by their kids. Governments can encourage women to be happy by having kids, and having a good education, so that they can afford to have kids, and not have to parasite off a man, which is unfair to men, and will cause men to continue the paternity boycott.
Governments need to encourage women to accept equal rights with men, AND equal obligations, i.e. governments need to become a lot more masculist in their policies and attitudes. It is the responsibility of governments to promote the welfare of its citizens, both male and female. In the current age, men are too often ignored, resulting in the current rise of MGTOW, which ultimately will wipe out populations. The current gender status quo cannot continue.
What’s wrong with the above skeleton ideas? How could their weaknesses be patched up?
I’ll play devil’s advocate with myself and see if I can fix my own problems.
What happens if too many women insist on remaining fluffies and use their female bloc vote to stop any such government plan along the above lines from being implemented?
Here is where the masculists come in. Fluffies can only be fluffies if some gullible manslave is prepared to be parasited upon by her. But the supply of such manslaves is drying up due to the effectiveness of the MGTOW and masculist movements in persuading men not to go near fluffie parasites. So fluffies will soon die out.
The masculists can persuade parents and teachers to put huge pressure on young women to FIP up. The masculists need to set up men’s lib groups in every high school and college, to put enormous moral pressure on fluffie class mates to FIP up or be manless, and spat at as parasitic criminals.
What about the enormous expense? I think the answer is that automation, robotics, AI, are about to cause a productivity revolution, so that a modern society could afford the above program. Sure, the tax rates will go up to Scandinavian levels of more than half of your income disappearing in tax, but people will get a lot of it back in subsidies, especially if they are parents.
How to change the gender laws if women bloc vote against them, preferring the current status quo, especially in the divorce courts, that are so heavily biased in women’s favor?
Again, here is where the masculists save the day. The masculists can use the media to educate women, that if they don’t vote with men, to menfair the gender laws, e.g. re the divorce courts, and bringing in the Parer (paternity rejection right), then women will continue to remain babyless, due to the MGTOW paternity boycott by men. Thus the masculists can force women, through fear of babylessness, to vote with men to menfair the gender laws.
What if young women simply refuse to have more kids? How to persuade them? There are several ways. Governments can put moral pressure on them, so too can the schools and parents. Singles taxes can increase heavily to discourage singles from remaining being singles.
Those women who insist on being single mothers who are fluffies can be punished by governments, by taking the children away from the mother and putting them up for adoption. Governments need to be more masculist in their thinking, and not take the women’s side all the time. Fluffiedom needs to be punished, for its criminality, for its assumption of manslavery.
I hope the above ideas will stimulate you. For myself, I feel this is an ongoing work. I will very probably make more flyers on the above topic because it is of critical importance. We are talking about the preservation of whole populations, and the impact that gender roles have on that preservation or otherwise. It is a very important topic.
I hope this flyer will stimulate a debate amongst both sexes and governments on how to solve the population crash problem. Obviously governments need to listen to both sexes, not just the feminists. Men are half the population. Government refusal to listen to men’s gender problems has been criminal, because neglecting men’s issues has led to the current population crash. Governments need to wake up, by having their masculist consciousnesses raised.
A lot of work on the part of the masculists remains to be done in educating other men, women, and especially governments, who need to change the laws. If nothing is done, if the current grossly menunfair gender laws remain intact, then we get wiped out population wise, as the MGTOWs and men in general, continue to boycott paternity.
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
(YouTube channels) “de Garis Masculist MGTOW Flyers” “de Garis Essays”