Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc
MGTOW-MASCULIST BULLETS FOR HIGH SCHOOL-COLLEGE MALES
MGTOW-MASCULIST BULLETS FOR HIGH SCHOOL-COLLEGE MALES
MGTOW is starting to get traction with the general public. Recently the BBC did a TV documentary on the MGTOW movement. I haven’t seen it yet, but it is a milestone, the first of its kind (as far as I know.) Another first is the first book published with the word MGTOW explicitly in the title (by Tim Patten, entitled “MGTOW, Building Wealth & Power”
This flyer aims to help that traction along a bit by providing high school and college men with the main MGTOW-Masculist ideas, so that they can use them at school, at university, attacking feminist women when the latter get too arseholey, or too arrogant. These ideas also are capable of changing men’s lives, so are important in that aspect as well.
So here are some of the main MGTOW-Masculist ideas. To go deeper, watch the 1000s of YouTube videos on the topic, particularly those of Turd Flinging Monkey (TFM), Sandman, Thinking Ape, etc.
Why now? Why are 70% of young men under 35 in the US and Japan refusing marriage and paternity? Because of the fluffie feminist takeover of the divorce courts, which now financially massacre roughly one married man in four (forcing him to lose his kids, his house, paying child payments, and alimony to his fluffie ex wife so that she can continue to parasite off his money after the divorce, the way she did before the divorce.)
A fluffie is a traditional woman who expects to be able to parasite off the money of a man, i.e. make a manslave of him, so that he pays for her to live in a middle class house to raise her kids in.
Now that we have the contraceptive pill, and women choose to have 0, 1, 2 kids mostly, women can work, and given that they can work (i.e. 40 years or more of career time) THEY MUST WORK, anything else is parasitism off a man’s labor.
Masculism is men’ lib, i.e. liberating men from working for women. Masculists put enormous moral pressure on women to be FIPs (financially independent persons) and punish them if they aren’t, by refusing to have anything to do with them, not even sexing them. Thus fluffies rot on the shelf to extinction. The primary political goals of the masculists are to free men from manslavery by women, to force the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws, and to prevent MGTOWs/masculists from eventually wiping out whole populations.
MGTOWs/masculists often have “twaytwef” relationships with FIP women, i.e. the man and the woman are both FIPs and both have their own apartment (2A2F = 2 apartments, 2 FIPs). This lifestyle gives men the regular sex he needs, and some female companionship without paying the terrible cost of a toxic divorce. Two thirds of US and Japanese men reason that marriage and having kids is WAY TOO RISKY, so they don’t take the risk. SO GUYS, DONT MARRY, DONT HAVE KIDS!
MGTOW teaches men about the psychology of women, that they do NOT LOVE MEN, they love men’s exploitability, and that women EVOLVED to be like that. If a man loses his exploitability by her, she is evolved to coldly drop him and look for another manslave to sexploit. This idea is called the “red pill” by MGTOWs, analogous to the red pill in the movie “Matrix” i.e. choosing to face up to the tough reality (i.e. in the movie, that the intelligent machines are using humans as battery power, and feeding their brains electronic signals (the matrix) to make them think they are living in the 20th century.) MGTOWs call men who have not swallowed the red pill, “blue pill men” i.e. still living in the matrix, i.e. still believing that women love men for qualities other than his exploitability by her.
MGTOW also teaches that women are hypergamous, i.e. always on the look out for a more sexploitable male. If one comes along and there is a serious possibility she can make the switch, she will, and have little feeling for the man she dumps, because that is her evolved nature. It makes perfect Darwinian evolutionary sense if you think about it, given that in the distant past, women depended on men to give them protein to survive, and so their children could survive. A man who lost his protein providing capacity, was quickly dumped. That’s how women are – the red pill.
MGTOWs tend to be more politically passive than masculists. Most MGTOWs are content to just walk away from marriage and kids, spending their money on themselves. Masculists are much more political. They push for the creation of men’s lib groups at high schools, and colleges, to help spread MGTOW/masculist ideas. But MGTOWs are not totally politically impotent. They do make lots of MGTOW YouTube videos, to get the message out.
Masculists push to interest the journalists to write stories/make TV programs etc about MGTOW/masculist ideas. Via the broadcast media, it will be possible to reach the masses, the billions, so that in time, MGTOW/masculist ideas become as well known as feminist ideas are today (a process that took half a century from the beginning of the rise of 2nd wave feminism in the 60s.)
Masculists have a hatred of the gender politicians who changed the divorce laws in the 70s to make them strongly biased in favor of fluffie ex wives, and not caring about the horrible and massive cost to men, hence the “man strike.” So masculists put pressure on the gender politicians to “menfair” the gender laws, otherwise, the MGTOWs/masculists will continue to wipe out whole populations.
Masculists want a Parer (paternity rejection right) so that men can refuse unwanted pregnancies. If the woman continues the pregnancy and does not abort, then she, as a FIP, takes FULL financial responsibility for the kid. Women have a Marer, but men don’t have a Parer, a massive sexual discrimination against men, and one of the many reasons why masculists insist so strongly that ALL women must become FIPs or be manless, i.e. loveless, sexless, childless, poor, and increasingly, as MGTOW/masculist ideas spread, shunned by society, who increasingly will look upon fluffies as “immoral, parasitic, manslaving vermin.”
So, when some feminist class mate of yours starts sprouting how men oppress women, by absorbing the ideas in this flyer, and watching MGTOW YouTube videos, you will have the intellectual bullets to shoot back at her, and scare her shitless. Tell her the first category of women to be rejected by men are the feminazi bitches. Feminazis will certainly rot on the shelf, not even being sexed.
When you see the majority of your female colleagues at high school studying “fluffie crap” i.e. being “fluffie crappers” i.e. not studying math and the sciences (STEM majors), then they will be forced to study fluffie crap at college, then wont earn good money on the whole, so in their 30s when their biological clock is ticking hard, they will be fluffies, looking for some man slave to parasite upon, but the supply of them in a decade or so will have almost totally dried up. You can point the finger at these fluffie crappers and label them as such. They are future fluffie parasites, and will be punished by men. Tell them “Be FIP, or be manless!” “No calculus, no baby!” Scare the shit out of them.
Tell them that men are nearly all FIPs. We are raised that way, and evolved to be FIPs. We men have the power to force women to be FIPs, because a fluffie can only be a fluffie if some manslave is willing to pay for her, but such men are disappearing fast. With no manslave to parasite upon, a fluffie will be poor, and deservedly so. She did not make the effort to become a FIP, so she pays the price, i.e. no man.
Use these MGTOW/masculist bullets to shoot down fluffies and fluffie feminists. Most feminists are fluffie feminists, because they know nothing of MGTOW/masculism. It is up to you to teach them, and to get them to shut up. Frighten them. Piss them off. Tell them that if they don’t study FIP-majors (math and the sciences, STEM majors) they will almost inevitably become fluffies, and hence men will shy away from them, preferring to have twaytwef relationships only with FIP women, until the gender politicians menfair the gender laws.
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis