Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc
MGTOW/MASCULIST ANGER AT BEING SEEN BY WOMEN AS CASH MACHINES
MGTOW/MASCULIST ANGER AT BEING SEEN BY WOMEN AS CASH MACHINES
The idea that I have learned from the MGTOWs that most pisses me off, that makes me very angry about women’s nature, women’s psychology, is their evolved behavior of judging men by men’s EQ (exploitability quotients), i.e. women evolved to be parasites on men’s protein gathered from male hunting, and judge men to the extent that women can benefit from that male protein by bribing him with female sex. Women are deeply intrinsically evolved to be prostitutes to men, which is why the human female is the sexiest of mammals. Human females do not have days of being sexually “in heat” the way dogs or monkeys have, because human females are always in heat. They can have sex any day of the month. They evolved this way, to be able to extract, i.e. bribe men to give them protein from the male hunt, to feed themselves and their babies.
The prehuman baby’s brain doubled in size in a mere million years, which was strongly selected for because intelligence strongly increases survivability, but the bigger head needed a larger birth canal in the female hip bone (pelvis). There was a limit to how wide the birth canal could be before the stresses on the hip bone became life threatening to women, so prehuman babies were born prematurely, so that the baby’s brain could continue to grow after the birth.
But prematurely born babies are useless and need constant attention, so prehuman females could not roam far from home, looking for food, so became dependent on men to hunt for them. Prehuman females evolved to be the sexiest of mammals as a result of bribing males with female sex for male protein.
In today’s world, women still behave as prostitutes to men. There was a famous experiment done showing women two photos of the same handsome man. In one he is dressed in a MacDonald’s uniform, and in the other in an Armani suit, leaning on a Lamborghini sport’s car. The women had moisture detectors placed in their vaginas. The women moistened a lot more at the sight of the rich man than the poor man, even though it was evident to the women that it was the same man in both photos.
I remember an incident in my own life that illustrates that women will vaginally wet at the sight of a rich, single man. I was at the Davos World Economic Forum in 1998 giving a talk on the rise of massively intelligent machines, and stood 3m away from Bill Gates. I could not have gotten any closer to him even if I had wanted to, because he was surrounded by 4 circles of females. Gates was the super stimulus, and he was surrounded by dripping vaginas.
BUT, despite knowing that women evolved to be prostitutes to men, to bribe men with female sex to give them protein for themselves and their babies, I am still very angry at women who judge me largely by my EQ, my exploitability quotient. In one of my flyers, I expressed this anger in the form of a masculist slogan which was the title of the masculist flyer I wrote – “I’m more than a cash machine, you bitch!” If I sense that a woman is sizing me up, trying to assess how much I am worth in financial terms, and ignoring my other traits, especially those traits that are closest to my heart, i.e. intellectual traits, my self-image as a thinker, a sage, an intellectual, an ideas guy, then I feel abused, used, degraded. I am more than a cash machine you bitch!
As a masculist, I expect women to be FIPs and EMOs (financially independent persons) who bothered to get a FIP education, which gave them the ability to earn good money, so that they were true FIPs and as women did not have to parasite off the money of a man. But a woman being a FIP is not enough. As a masculist I expect her also to have EMO values, i.e. that she expects, on moral grounds, to have “equal moral obligations” with men, i.e. feeling the moral obligation to pull her weight financially with men, expecting men to be given equal rights as women etc, e.g. she supports the legislation of the Parer (paternity rejection right, the male equivalent of the female Marer, aka abortion right. If the mother continues the pregnancy, then she gets full legal responsibility for the costs of the kid.)
I know women evolved to be parasites on men, but that doesn’t soften my disgust and contempt for women’s looking at me as a man in terms of my EQ, my financial state, my willingness to give women gifts in exchange for sex. I reject all that and feel abused by being treated like a piece of meat by women.
I had a similar feeling as a young man when I was conscripted by the Australian government to fight in the Vietnam War. I felt an utter hatred for that government at the time, and used to roam around the cemetery at night near my university college dreaming up plots to throw grenades into the meetings of the politicians. I was outraged, full of hatred, at being treated as a piece of meat, as cannon fodder, to force me to risk my life to further their ideologies.
So I have bitter memories of being treated like a piece of meat, whether by conscripting vermin politicians or by fluffie vermin females. The two feelings are similar. So as a masculist I put enormous moral pressure on women to be FIPs-EMOs or they are punished. They will not get a man. The primary political goal of the masculists is to wipe out fluffiedom, by wiping out fluffies, by ignoring them to death, i.e. so that they rot on the shelf, utterly ignored by men, so that they lead miserable lives, manless, loveless, sexless, babyless, poor and shunned by a society increasingly sympathetic to masculist/MGTOW ideas.
So women are going to have a hard time in the coming decades as masculist/MGTOW ideas rise and rise. As men become collectively fed up with women seeing men as cash machines. Millions of men, like myself will express our contempt at being used by women, exploited by women, seen only as useful to women if we give them money. Such women I despise, and want nothing to do with. Such women are fluffies whom I see as immoral, parasitic, manslaving vermin, to be wiped out, forced to be FIP-EMO or they don’t get a man even to twaytwef with them. (2A2F = 2 apartments, 2 FIPS, where the man and the woman are both FIPs and have their own apartments. When the sexual relationship ends, they return to their two apartments, cost free to the man.)
Women will be forced by masculists/MGTOWs to suppress their evolved prostitute natures, of judging men by men’s EQs (exploitability quotients). This will not be easy for women, because it is difficult to fight your own biology. If you are programmed genetically to vagina moisten at the sight of a rich single male, then women will have to make more effort to suppress this tendency, because if they don’t, they will pay a heavy price. They will be punished by men. A young woman who gets the reputation amongst her male acquaintances of being a fluffie, will be treated as though she has a capital F branded on her forehead, which will be the kiss of death for her in terms of ever getting a man. Her reputation of being a fluffie will condemn her to manlessness and a miserable rejected life.
So to the women reading this, become FIPs. Adopt EMO attitudes, or suffer. We men have the power to force you to be FIP-EMOs. If you are not, we will have nothing to do with you. We won’t even sex you. You will become FIP-EMOs or you rot on the shelf to extinction. So pay heed, listen and learn.
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis