profhugodegaris

Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc

TEACHING FEMINISTS MASCULISM

 

TEACHING FEMINISTS MASCULISM

Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis

profhugodegaris@yahoo.com

https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com

 

This flyer explains why it is a good idea for masculists to teach feminists the core ideas of masculism, and provides suggestions on how that can be done.

Firstly, why is it beneficial for men to have feminists familiar with masculist ideas? There are lots of reasons, a sample of which I list here in bulleted form and will then elaborate on them later.

  • Scare feminists with the babyless threat
  • Defuse feminist wrath
  • Expose fluffie feminist hypocrisy
  • Get feminists to shut up
  • Help to menfair the gender laws
  • Make women nicer to be with

  • Scare feminists with the babyless threat

Young feminists are still young women, so will be subject as much as any other young woman to the MGTOW/masculist threat of being manless and babyless, due to the boycott of young men of marriage and paternity caused by the takeover by the fluffie feminist hypocrites of the divorce courts, making divorce and hence marriage, toxic for men.

Young feminists need to be told by masculists that they should learn to hate the fluffie feminist hypocrites because it is the fluffie feminists, who are the root cause for young women not getting babies. The top priority in life for women is usually to have babies, so when they are seriously threatened by masculists who state that these young women’s feminism is the main reason why they are being forced by young men into manlessness and babylessness, that will stop them in their tracks.

This should shock young feminists into questioning their beliefs in feminism, as the bigger picture is explained to them by the masculists, i.e. briefly – feminism takes over the divorce courts, divorce is made toxic for males, millions of men get financially massacred in them, young men see the damage done to their fathers, etc., young men refuse to marry and have kids, young women become manless and childless. This is scary for many women, very scary.

  • Defuse feminist wrath

One of the consequences of feminism’s dominance in the gender debate is that many feminists have the belief that feminism has a monopoly on gender discourse. To masculists, such an idea is ridiculous, and merely shows the level of ignorance most feminists have towards MGTOW and masculism.

A typical reaction of a feminist hearing about masculism for the first time is “What do men have to be liberated from?” or “That’s ridiculous. Women are the oppressed sex. Men are the oppressors.”

To a masculist, hearing such a reaction from a one eyed feminist would probably evoke the following response. “Calling masculism ridiculous is as stupid and ignorant as a man calling feminism ridiculous, since women oppress men for example, by being financially parasitic on men, manslaving men, and oppressing them greatly!”

As feminists become increasingly exposed to masculist ideas, particularly the masculist critique of manslavery, the need to menfair the gender laws, especially the financial massacring that occurs against men in the divorce courts, the hypocracy of the lack of a Parer (paternity rejection right) when women have the Marer (aka abortion right), then women will be sobered.

They will learn that men are screwed by feminazi bitches in the divorce courts, and if they have any human decency at all, will be sympathetic to such men, i.e. one married father in four roughly.

Masculists get fed up with the wrath of feminists, which is why we call them feminazis. We are expressing our contempt for feminazi childishness, blaming men for everything, instead of taking control of their own lives and facing up to the reality that a large part of the blame for women’s situation, rests on women themselves, e.g. their genetic inferiority compared to men, so it is to be expected that there is a glass ceiling against women, because women are unable to perform at male levels at the top end of the performance scale.

Masculists can harangue feminazi bitches and make them see that feminists do not have a monopoly on gender discourse, that there is a masculist case to be made as well, and that feminists had better listen to the masculists, otherwise men may eventually take away women’s rights, as the population seriously starts to plummet, due to the paternity boycott of young men, caused by the feminists.

When feminists become conscious that women oppress men as well, that will soften their wrath. They will be aware that women can oppress men, especially by manslaving them. The presence of masculism as part of everyone’s consciousness will balance out feminist dictatorship of the gender debate.

  • Expose fluffie feminist hypocrisy

When feminists go on a demonstration, or give a public talk to mixed audiences, angry masculists in the audience can harangue the feminist speakers with the awful hypocrisy of feminazis in the divorce courts.

Most feminists are still fluffies, i.e. they have had their feminist consciousnesses raised but not their masculist consciousnesses raised, so by default still have traditional fluffie attitudes towards men, i.e. seeing men as cash machines, having the attitude that men exist on this earth to pay for women to have babies.

The feminazis took control of the divorce courts in the 70s and made them toxic for men. Divorcing fathers get financially massacred in these courts by losing their kids with 90% probability, losing their house to their fluffie ex-wives, and half their possessions, paying child support and often alimony for life, so that their fluffie ex-wives can continue to parasite off their ex-husbands after the divorce the way they did before the divorce.

There is a profound hypocrisy with the fluffie feminists. They want their cake and to eat it too. They want equal rights with men, but reject equal obligations with men in bothering to get a career competent education that will allow them to earn good money as adults, and not have to parasite off the money of a man.

Masculists need to tell women clearly that fluffies are the enemy of the masculists, that the masculists plan to wipe them out by totally ignoring them, forcing them to rot on the shelf, manless, loveless, sexless, babyless, poor and spat at.

When feminists become accustomed to being harangued in public talks and meetings by angry masculists that will make them conscious of their hypocrisy. No one likes being accused of being hypocrites, so that will help them self-reflect.

  • Get feminists to shut up

Masculists are fed to the teeth with feminazi bitches complaining about men, blaming men for everything wrong about women’s lives. We are fed up, and are now on the attack. When some feminazi bitch starts haranguing men for male oppression of women, angry masculists harangue them back with superior brainpower, superior logic and a lot more verbal aggression because men have much higher testosterone levels and can be very fierce when men choose to be.

A good masculist orator can blast feminazis out of the room, with a tirade of masculist wrath, telling the audience that feminazis are now genociders, causing young men to reject paternity due to the feminazi takeover of the divorce courts, making divorce and hence marriage toxic for males. The feminazis have to be stopped. They have become a cancer on the planet that has to be stamped out.

Masculists need to persuade society that being feminist is the kiss of death for a young woman in terms of getting a man. No man wants a relationship with a misandrist, male dumping, feminazi, bitch.

Most fairly attractive women know this, so do not let on that they might be sympathetic to feminist ideas privately, because they know it might cost them their boyfriends. “Triple F” women on the other hand, i.e. “fat four feminazis” are triply handicapped, and are utterly rejected by men, not even being pumped and dumped.

Such women are bitter against men for being so rejected and use feminism as a form of revenge against men for rejecting them. Such women cannot be persuaded to reject feminism, because it serves as a rationalization for their miserable lives, that they do not have the intelligence to break out of the vicious circle they have locked themselves into, i.e. they express their contempt for men who reject them, the men around them then don’t want to hear this, so reject them, closing the vicious circle.

But many feminists are not ugly, and are FIPs (financially independent persons) yet still complain bitterly about men. Masculists need to target such women and teach them masculist ideas, so that these women can see that gender issues have TWO sides, and are not a feminist one way street. That will stop feminists in their tracks, as they learn that women oppress men too, especially with manslavery, with fluffie parasitism, that the masculists aim to wipe off the surface of the earth by totally ignoring fluffies.

  • Help to menfair the gender laws

Masculists are very aware that there aren’t enough male voters to force the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws (e.g. menfair the divorce laws, bring in the Parer, etc.) so women need to be converted into female masculists to join forces with men in voting in favor of menfairing the gender laws.

Many feminists agree with the masculists that women should get off their fluffie arses and FIP up. The more male minded women have been feminists for decades. They want to have careers and be challenged by the outside world, in the world of risks, challenges and rewards.

Masculists need to teach masculist ideas to the world so that women and feminists are exposed to them, so that some of them become sympathetic to the masculist cause and become female masculists, putting their vote where their mouth is by helping men get the gender politicians to vote in the menfairing of the gender laws.

Masculists need to be teaching women as much as men about masculist ideas, because men cannot do it alone. One of the primary political goals of the masculists is to see the menfairing of the gender laws, and that cannot be done with men alone. So it is high priority for masculists to bother to educate women and feminists to help men menfair the gender laws.

  • Make women nicer to be with

A feminist who knows nothing about masculism will have a one sided view of the gender issues and is more likely to feel inclined to lash out at men when all she hears about is how men oppress women. When she starts hearing from the masculists how women oppress men, with their manslavery, their laziness, expecting to parasite off the labor and money of a man, etc., she will be sobered.

She will think to herself “Those masculists have a point. I want equal rights with men, but would like to have a man pay for me to have kids in a house he pays for. But if I get divorced, why should I take all his possessions, his kids, his money etc. That’s not fair. I understand why the masculists hate the fluffie feminist control of the divorce courts. It’s so unjust. Men have a gender story too.”

When women see both sides of the gender debate, they will become more balanced in their criticisms against men. They will see that men have equal reason to complain against women, and that will quieten her. That will make her more reasonable to be with. She will be more sympathetic towards men and men’s horrible gender problems. She will probably think, “Why do I as a woman have the right to reject an unwanted pregnancy, but men don’t have that right, so are forced into paying for a kid that they don’t want, ruining their lives. That’s not fair. That’s unjust. That’s not reasonable. Part of me is a female masculist.

Now that I’ve been exposed to masculist thinking, I suppose mostly due to my masculist boyfriend, I see things from both sides now. That makes me less of an angry feminist, because I see that the feminists have harmed men grievously in the divorce courts. That’s wrong. That should be changed.”

To men, a woman who thinks like that, is a lot nicer to be with.

The above, showed some of the main benefits to men of teaching feminists masculist ideas. Now how can this be done? What methods can be employed to teach feminists masculist ideas? Here is a list of bulleted ideas that will be elaborated on later.

  • Teaching via the broadcast media
  • Face to face teaching
  • Teaching via university campus wide talks
  • Student newspapers and websites
  • Men’s Studies courses
  • Masculist boyfriend influence
  • Masculist social circle pressure
  • Parental masculist pressure
  • Secondary school masculist pressure
  • Female masculist friend pressure

  • Teaching via the broadcast media

A major task lies ahead for the masculists, and that is the teaching of the general public about masculist ideas. For most people, ideas come into their heads not from their own creative thoughts, but from exposure to ideas from the broadcast media.

The masculists need to contact the media in a big way and persuade them that masculism is the biggest story of our historical era, because if the feminazis continue on as they are going then they will indirectly wipe out the whole population due to the paternity boycott they have generated with young men, who refuse to marry and have kids.

There needs to be a close relationship between the media and the masculist star speakers and spokesmen, who are highly intelligent, articulate, have good media personalities, are masters of the sound bite, who can get the masculist message across to the general public, educating them on masculist ideas, to liberate men from manslavery, to menfairing the gender laws etc. A lot of work needs to be done on this front.

  • Face to face teaching

Once the media is well launched by the masculists, and a fair proportion of the public is aware of masculist ideas, then a snow ball effect can begin, whereby those people who have not been exposed to masculist ideas can be influenced by them via their friends and acquaintances in ordinary daily conversations.

For example if two women are chatting, and one says to the other that she wished some prince charming would come along and solve her money worries, then her friend could warn her about the masculists wanting to rid the world of fluffies, and that it would be dangerous for her friend to say such a thing to a potential boyfriend, because he might be a masculist and hearing her desire, drop her like a hot potato accusing her of being a hated fluffie parasite, a manslaving vermin.

  • Teaching via university campus wide talks

The masculists need to set up men’s lib groups on every campus, at every high school etc. They can organize big talks that are open to the whole student body, by inviting prominent masculist authors, speakers, etc., who have a national reputation, and known to be good speakers.

Such big talks, will influence the student body in a big way. Speakers can follow their talks with extensive Q&A sessions, so that students can be given ample opportunity to express their views and be swayed by each other.

  • Student newspapers and websites

College and university students can be influenced by long articles in student newspapers and websites on masculist ideas. Feminazi ideas can be attacked causing feminists to think twice about their attitudes towards men, especially when feminists see the tide turning in favor of men’s issues.

Feminists will be afraid of being attacked by both men and women as the proportion rises of women who convert themselves into  female masculists, as they become aware that the feminazis have become genociders, wiping out whole populations due to their indirect creation of the male boycott of paternity.

  • Men’s Studies courses

Once masculist and MGTOW ideas are well enough known and there is a demand for Men’s Studies courses to be set up at universities – that should be done. The men’s lib group of a university can push its administration to set up such a course by hiring a professor to teach the principles of MGTOW and masculism, perhaps writing a book on the subject until standard texts are available, but that is far from being the case today.

  • Masculist boyfriend influence

Many feminists will be influenced by masculist ideas, due to their boyfriends. Once many men have been exposed to masculist ideas, they will inevitably pass them on to their girlfriends, challenging them with antifeminist ideas coming from the masculists who see the feminazis as the enemy, as toxic, as a cancer, who indirectly are acting as genociders.

In the 60s and 70s, there were a large number of divorces as millions of women became influenced by feminist ideas and no longer accepted the traditional housewife role and rebelled against it, causing traditional men to be nonplussed. Similarly, it is to be expected that many women will be rejected in their personal relationships with men, by masculist influenced men who no longer put up with the traditional fluffie attitudes of their girlfriends, and then dump them in favor of more female masculist, FIP women, who expect to pull their financial weight equally with men, in sharing equally the burden of earning the living etc.

  • Masculist social circle pressure

As a non-negligible proportion of people in a given social circle become aware of masculist ideas, they will be able to pass them on to their friends, influencing them, thus setting up a snowball effect until everyone in the social circle is aware of masculist ideas.

Reality shows, that once some new ideology, some new thinking is known by about 10% of the population, usually the brightest 10%, then that is enough to cause the rest of the population to think the same way.

Part of this phenomenon is due to the IQ Bell curve. Most people are incapable of original thought. Most new ideas start in the minds of a tiny intellectual minority, who start off in their “Intellectuals Crying in the Wilderness” phase, followed by the media people taking up their ideas, spreading them to the general public, who then spread them further amongst themselves until a saturation is reached in which everyone knows about them, and they become part of everyone’s general knowledge.

  • Parental masculist pressure

When nearly everyone knows about masculist ideas, parents can influence their children, especially their teenage daughters into being conscious of masculist thinking. Parents want to prevent  their daughters from experiencing painful situations, so can warn them that they need to study for a FIP oriented education, so that they do not rot on the shelf, being utterly rejected by men for being a hated fluffie parasite.

Parents can have a huge influence on their kids, because they can brainwash their kids from infancy, filling their young heads with anything the parents want.

Children are hardwired to absorb and follow the teachings of their parents. That’s how they learn. Look at the way most religionists have the same religion as their parents, not questioning it, merely absorbing it.

  • Secondary school masculist pressure

Once the media have done their masculist teaching job, teachers at primary and secondary schools can take up the torch, influencing their young students to FIP up, or not get a man. Young women can be steered into the career competent majors, so that they are more likely to get a man. Teachers can relate horror stories of women who did not bother to FIP up and hence paid a horrible price, by not getting a man, being rejected by men, by society, by their female friends, by being seen as a fluffie parasite.

Teachers can have a strong influence on kids, almost as much as parents. Teachers have an important role to play in spreading masculist ideas to young minds.

  • Female masculist friend pressure

Females place enormous importance on the opinions of their close female friends, their peer group. If some of this group is female masculist, that will cause the other members of the group to be a lot more open to female masculism as well. The female masculists of the group can warn the other members that if they don’t FIP up, and help men menfair the gender laws, vote with men to force the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws, then they will run a serious risk of not getting a man, and being rejected by everyone, by men, by teachers, by their parents, by society in general. Being a fluffie will be decidedly “out.”

Women have a much stronger herd mentality than men, more sheep like. Look at female fashion. This female herd mentality can be used to great advantage by masculist strategists, who think that once masculist ideas become “fashionable” by female standards, then that will help considerably the spread of masculist ideas amongst feminists and the female population in general.

The above reasons and methods to be used to teach feminists masculist ideas are probably the main ones. There are probably others you can think of. Feminism used to be thought of as the solution to women’s problems. However in today’s world, feminism is now seen by the masculists as the problem, that needs to be removed.

Most masculists probably think that second wave feminism, if it was confined to equality of rights with men, is not a problem, but gynocentrism, gynocracy, i.e. rule by women at men’s expense, is not to be tolerated, and hence feminists need to be taught masculist ideas to set feminists straight.

Cheers,

Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis

profhugodegaris@yahoo.com

https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com

(YouTube channels) “de Garis Masculist MGTOW Flyers”  “de Garis Essays”

%d bloggers like this: