Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc
RETHINKING MASCULIST POLITICAL STRATEGY
RETHINKING MASCULIST POLITICAL STRATEGY
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
This flyer irons out some wrinkles in the masculist political strategy to free men from manslavery and to have the gender laws menfaired.
One of the core ideas in the masculist political strategy is to persuade women to become female masculists, so as to allow the combined vote of men plus female masculists to reach about 60% of the total vote, thus forcing the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws.
If this strategy is NOT pursued, then the female bloc vote will remain the majority vote, so that the gender politicians will not change their position, and thus keep the gender laws as they are, i.e. highly biased in women’s favor at great cost to men.
So how to persuade women to become female masculists? There are two broad categories of ways. One uses the carrot, i.e. it tries to persuade women to be sympathetic to men’s gender plight, particularly in the divorce courts, that are so screamingly unjust to men.
Many women who are FIPs, who do not feel threatened by the masculist push for the FIPping of women, will be sympathetic to men’s issues, for the same kind of reason that some men are sympathetic to women’s issues. These women will agree with the arguments of the masculists for the same kind of reasons as many liberal minded men agreed with second wave feminism, in pushing for equal pay for equal work, for female access to the professions, for an abortion right, etc.
There are millions of such “reasonable” women, from a masculist perspective, so all we masculists really need to do, is to reach out to such women, and teach them masculist ideas. These women will then work on themselves, to become female masculists.
Of course, they will need to be FIP women, because if they are fluffies, they will feel deeply threatened by the masculist message, that puts enormous moral pressure on women to FIP up, and hence will be opposed to masculism, wanting it to be wiped out, because to a fluffie, her very survival is at stake, if she loses her manslave to masculist/MGTOW ideas.
But, to reach FIP women, i.e. FIP liberal women, we masculists need to get the masculist/MGTOW message out to the masses, so that these FIP liberal women can be influenced by masculist/MGTOW ideas. Not all women will feel threatened by the masculist/MGTOW strategies to free mem from manslavery, and to menfair the gender laws.
However, probably far more women will be persuaded to become female masculists, by using a stick approach, i.e. by using women’s fear of being babyless and manless.
The masculist reasoning here is that if women don’t become female masculists and vote with the men to force the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws, then the gender status quo will not change. Men will continue to be financially massacred and have their lives destroyed in the fluffie feminist hypocrite dominated divorce courts, and hence, young men will continue to refuse to marry, refuse to have kids, and spend their money on themselves, i.e. they will continue to adopt the MGTOW lifestyle.
Thus 100s of millions of women will become manless, and babyless, given that in a string of major countries now, two thirds of young men under 35 refuse to marry, refuse to have kids and live the MGTOW lifestyle. They may pump and dump women, but do not give them children.
Women’s top priority in most cases is to reproduce, to have babies, so when the masculists and MGTOWs get on the broadcast media and teach women that they have to both FIP up and become female masculists, otherwise they will remain babyless and manless.
This fear of not having a baby, will be stronger than their reluctance to give up their female privileges in the fluffie feminist dominated divorce courts.
In western countries, women have huge privileges in the divorce courts. They get custody of the kids with 90% probability, her ex-husband’s house, to raise her kids in, half his stuff, child payments from him, and often alimony, even for life, is she is a real fluffie.
Of course most women will not want to give up such massive privileges, that the fluffie feminists have given women.
But with the MGTOWs/masculists telling women that if they don’t vote with men to menfair the gender laws, particularly menfairing the divorce laws and bringing in the Parer (paternity rejection right), then these women will not have babies, and will not have a relationship with a man.
But, you may object that any woman who really wants a baby can always manage to find some man who is more than willing to give her his sperm!? Well, yes and no. Yes, any woman can go to some local pub, have a one night stand and get pregnant with some trash male she picks up at the pub.
But, women are hypergamous, so an upper middle class woman will not want to do this, because she knows that a trash male will result in a trash kid, which goes against her evolved hypergamous instinct. She will want to get pregnant by a quality male, whose DNA will produce a quality child.
So just picking up a trash male at the pub is not an option for most women, particularly for the upper middle class woman, whom the masculists/MGTOWs are first reaching out to, the rationale being, that if the upper middle class females can be persuaded to become female masculists, then the middle middle class females will follow in their footsteps as they always have.
The middle middle class females don’t have the brains to be persuaded readily by intellectual arguments, so merely follow the herd. If the herd is led by upper middle class females, then masculists/MGTOWs ought to concentrate first on persuading the upper middle class females.
So what can upper middle class women who really want a quality kid do, in face of the paternity boycott of the MGTOWs and masculists? She could try to get a sperm donor from some quality male. There are probably lots of quality males who would be prepared to donate their sperm to spread their seed to many women. Men evolved to do such a thing.
There is a problem for such sperm donors however, and that is in many western countries, the fluffie feminist hypocrites have made the gender laws so toxic for men, that a sperm donor may find that some donee slams a paternity suit on him, since he is the father. In those countries where such a risk exists, i.e. where there is NO legislation that protects him from being the victim of a fluffie feminist’s paternity suit, then almost no men will be willing to be sperm donors.
So that option is also excluded for most upper middle class females in many countries.
But what about in those countries, where sperm donors are legally protected from being slammed with a paternity suit? In that case, a woman can get sperm from a quality man and impregnate herself and have a quality kid that she wants.
BUT, she will have to support it financially on her own. One of the masculist slogans in this regard is “Hey, femalien, if you want to have a kid, you’ll have to pay for it yourself!
Experience has shown over the past half century, since the discovery of the contraceptive pill that being a careerist woman AND raising small children is extremely tiring. Such a woman needs to be a “supermom”, i.e. she needs to be a real FIP, to be able to earn a good salary, so that she can afford to pay for a nanny, to look after her kids when she is at her well-paying career.
She will also have to juggle two balls in the air at the same time, an extremely time and energy demanding task, as any supermom can tell you. Typically such women, often burn out by the time they are in their 40s, such is the energy and stress demands of the dual role of her lifestyle, i.e. of being a well-paid FIP, and being a single mother.
Many upper middle class women will not want to choose this life style, far preferring to have a man around, who can share the burden of earning the living, so that she can spare more of her time being with the very small children, and rely on her man for a few years until her children are at kindergarten, so that she can get back to her career.
BUT, as more men go MGTOW and masculist, due to the toxicity of the fluffie feminist hypocrite dominated divorce courts, the supply of such manslavable men will continue to dry up. So even if upper middle class women can find sperm from quality men donors, in those countries that do have laws that protect sperm donors from paternity suits, she is still left with the husband shortage.
It is likely that if the gender laws stay as they are, then within a decade, the percentage of men who are MGTOWs and masculists will be over 90%, so that almost every woman will either be babyless, or if she if a real FIP, she may have a kid by sperm donor, but she will still be manless, and hence have to be a supermom, and live the life of high stress and energy, which will burn her out.
So the masculists still have a strategy they can use on women, threatening them that if they don’t vote with men to menfair the gender laws, then they will be manless, and hence will have to be FIPs to have a kid, and even then only in those countries that have sperm donor protection laws.
This is still a powerful argument, a powerful strategy that the masculists can use to twist the arms of women to become female masculists, so that they vote together with men to menfair the gender laws.
The masculists have other arguments they can use on women to persuade them to become female masculists. For example, the masculists can teach women that the fluffie feminists are hypocrites, wanting equal rights with men, but rejecting equal obligations with men, to bother to get a career competent education, so that they can be FIPs as adults, and not parasite off the money of some gullible manslave as an adult.
Masculists can thus shame women into becoming FIPs and not be hated by masculists for being hypocritical fluffie feminists.
Masculists can also teach women that the feminazis are now genociders because they are the root cause for why MGTOWs and masculists are rejecting marriage and paternity, due to the toxicity of the divorce courts, taken over by these feminazis, making divorce so toxic for makes, than they utterly reject marriage and paternity.
Most men are now arguing, “If the odds of losing my kids are one in four, roughly, then why bother having kids at all?!” Why indeed, so it is not surprising, that most young men now do a cost benefit analysis, and come to the practical decision, not to marry, and not to have kids. They then choose to live a MGTOW lifestyle, perhaps pumping and dumping women, or ignoring women totally, preferring not to have to put up with women’s inherent negative traits, e.g. female nagging, being irrational, being emotional and hysterical.
The masculists can teach women that the feminazis are the most hated of women by men, and especially by the masculists who already have a hatred of fluffies, whom they see as “immoral, parasitic, manslaving vermin” and avoid them like the plague, but fluffie feminists are not only fluffies, but are hypocrites as well, because they are feminists in the parliaments, i.e. pushing for equal rights for women, but are fluffies in the divorce courts, still expecting to be able to parasite off the money of a man.
Women can be taught that if they are feminists, then that will be the kiss of death for them in terms of getting a man. The feminazis are so hated by men now, that women can be taught “No man wants a relationship with a feminist, i.e. with a misandrist, man dumping, feminazi, bitch.” Such women are hated and the first to be rejected, left rotting on the shelf to extinction, so that their feminazi bitch genes are removed from the gene pool.
Women can be taught that men have the financial power to FORCE women to FIP up, since men are socialized and evolved to be FIPs, so don’t need to parasite off the money of a woman to survive financially. A fluffie (a traditional woman who expects to be able to parasite off the money of a man) can only be a fluffie if she can get her financial claws into some manslave, but the MGTOWs and masculists are causing men to refuse to be manslaves, preferring the MGTOW lifestyle, liberating men from being manslaves to parasitic, bloody fluffies.
All these arguments can be applied to women by the masculists, so that women become strongly motivated to vote with men to force the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws, menfair the divorce laws, bring in the Parer (paternity rejection right) and menfair the many social and legal discriminations against men.
This masculist strategy, i.e. work on women, by teaching them MGTOW/masculist ideas, so that some women (i.e. the liberal upper middle class, FIP type women) become female masculists and hence motivated to help men liberate themselves from both manslavery to hated fluffie parasites, and from the tyranny of the highly menunfair gender laws.
The masculists need not only to educate women to become female masculists, the masculists also need to educate the MGTOWs to convert themselves into politically active, angry, masculists, who then roll up their sleeves and do the hard work, similar to what that the feminists went through in the 60s, 70s, 80s, etc.
There is a ton of work for the masculists to do, e.g. set up masculist groups in every college and high school, to put enormous moral pressure on the fluffie 16 year old women who choose to study fluffie crap majors that will not allow them to become career competent as adults, and hence will become fluffies and then look around for some manslave to parasite upon in her 30s when she wants kids, and a middle class house to raise them in, that her manslave pays for.
Masculists need to approach the broadcast media, and teach the media people about the most important story of the century, i.e. that if the gender laws are not made menfair, the MGTOWs and masculists will continue to boycott paternity, and hence wipe out whole populations. The media people, need to be taught the ideas of the masculists and MGTOWs so that they can transmit these ideas to the masses, including women.
Men’s studies courses need to be set up in universities, to educate both sexes on how men suffer severe gender role problems too, on how women oppress men too.
A NOM needs to be created (National Organization for Men) equivalent to women’s NOW (National Organization for Women) in the US that aims to menfair the gender laws, that has the power to lobby gender politicians, etc.
Masculist sages need to write masculist books, teaching the upper middle class of both sexes about masculist and MGTOW ideas. Masculists are highly conscious of the strong need for education of the public in MGTOW/masculist ideas.
There remains so much to be done, but before beginning to walk down such a masculist path, it is obvious that the path itself needs to exist, to be clear, i.e. if millions of masculists are to become politically active, they will need to know what their agenda is, what their goals are, what their targets are, etc.
Hopefully, this flyer has clarified things a bit regarding what the masculists need to do, in terms of strategy, in terms of masculists’ agenda.
In short, the core idea is to persuade women to become female masculists, so that a combined vote of men plus female masculists will reach a total of about 60%, so that the gender politicians are forced to menfair the gender laws, that are needed to liberate men from manslavery and from a gynocentric culture that truly oppresses men.
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
(YouTube channels) “de Garis Masculist MGTOW Flyers” “de Garis Essays”