HYPERGAMY IS INHERENTLY PARASITIC

HYPERGAMY IS INHERENTLY PARASITIC

If one consults Wiktionary on the internet, it gives the definition of hypergamy as “seeking a spouse of higher socio-economic status.” Closely related to this is the MGTOW concept of “monkey branching” i.e. holding onto one branch like a monkey while testing out the next branch before releasing its hold on the earlier branch. Analogously, women are always on the lookout for a more exploitable male. If she can find one and the opportunity is realistic, she will coldly dump her current man, and monkey branch to the more exploitable male, i.e. with more wealth, more resources, more power, more prestige, etc. She will feel no guilt nor loyalty towards her former man, because she is female, she is hypergamous.
Women evolved this behavior. Giving the concept a bit of thought, it makes perfect Darwinian sense. Women depended for their very survival, and so too did their kids, on men giving women protein from the male hunt. The human female is the sexiest of mammals, because they evolved to be prostitutes to men, bargaining use of their vaginas in exchange for male hunted protein. Under protohuman conditions, when survival was on a knife edge, if a woman could dump an inferior male protein provider, and hypergamize her way to a superior male protein provider, then that may have been a matter of life or death for her and her kids.
But, we now live in the age of the contraceptive pill, where women typically have zero, one or two kids, so that they have a career window of some 40+ years, once their kids are off to school. The masculists insist that “Now that women can work, i.e. have careers, they MUST work, because anything else is financial parasitism on men, exploiting men, seeing men as cash machines, and not much else.”
Traditional women, who expect to be able to parasite off the money of men, are labeled “fluffies” by the masculists, based obviously on the word “fluff”, i.e. with connotations of being light, not serious, not adult, not responsible, not career competent, not FIP (financially independent person).
The primary political goal of the masculists (as distinct from the more a-political, passive approach of the MGTOWs, who simply walk away from marriage and paternity, spending their money on themselves) is to wipe out manslavery, by wiping out the fluffies, not by killing them, but by totally ignoring them so that they rot on the shelf to extinction.
You can make an analogy between the abolitionists of the 1800s in the US, and the masculists of today. The abolitionists wanted to wipe out negro slavery. The masculists want to wipe out man slavery.
How do masculists implement their major political goal? By educating society to treat fluffies with contempt, as parasites, as immoral, manslaving vermin, to be wiped out. Masculists approach the media and explain to them the utter hypocrisy of fluffie feminism, which pushes equal rights for women, but REJECTS equal obligations for women, (i.e. expecting in EMO (equal moral obligations) style, to share in the burden of earning the living, i.e. by becoming EMO FIPs.) It is not enough for the masculists that a woman is a FIP, she also has to be EMO in her attitudes, i.e. that she feels she has a moral OBLIGATION to be FIP, purely on the grounds of moral fairness, and not to expect, fluffie style, to exploit men for their resources.
BUT, women evolved to be fluffies. It’s in their DNA. So it’s not so surprising that the feminists are still fluffies when it comes to marriage and especially divorce. The fluffie feminists in all their hypocrisy, expect men to pay for them after the divorce, i.e. they expect to get custody of THEIR kids (as actually happens in about 90% of cases), they get the ex-husband’s house to raise HER kids in, they get child payments from the ex-husband for HER kids that he barely sees, and in many countries, she will get alimony, so that she can continue to parasite on the ex-husband after the divorce, the same way she did before the divorce, with no moral nor legal obligation on her part to get off her fat parasitic arse and turn herself into a FIP and grow up.
It is largely due to the toxicity of the fluffie feminist dominated divorce courts, that the MGTOW lifestyles for men have become the large majority in the major countries e.g. in the US, Japan, Germany, 2/3 of young men under 35 refuse to marry, refuse to have kids, and spend their money on themselves, utterly eschewing fluffies, letting them rot on the shelf. In the UK now, young men judge potential girlfriends MORE by the woman’s level of FIPness than her looks.
Masculists harangue fluffie feminists, and point the finger at them for being the hypocrites that they are. Masculists are ideologically armed with masculist ideas, masculist rhetoric, and lambast feminists if feminists denigrate men in public, attacking them with real male venom.
Masculists aim to create a “FIP Society” i.e. one in which all adults are FIPs. Girls are to be socialized to be FIPs and more especially EMO FIPs (i.e. morally expecting to be FIPs) by parents and teachers. Girls are to be taught that if they are not FIPs, they will be ostracized by society, and rejected utterly by men as manslaving parasites, that men will not go near.
Masculists know that men have the power to FORCE women to be FIPs, or go manless. Nearly all men are socialized to be FIPs. A woman can only be a fluffie if she can manage to get her financial claws into some manslavable, gullible, stupid, ignorant male, but since MGTOW and masculist ideas are spreading and spreading, thanks to the internet, the supply of such manslavable males is drying up, thus forcing women to be FIPs or be poor and manless.
The FIPping of society has a long way to go, because in the high schools, about ¾ of young women of age 16 in their junior year, choose to become fluffies, by choosing to study “fluffie crap” majors, rather than career competent majors such as math and the sciences, that will allow them to study the same majors at university, so that they can earn a good salary as adults, and not have to look around for some gullible manslave to parasite upon so that she can live in a middle class house, to raise HER kids, that HE pays for.
So, the masculists are forcing women to deny their evolved hypergamous natures. Women judge men by men’s EQs (exploitability quotients) i.e. how rich they are, how much money can a man spend on her. The masculists are out to change all this. The masculists are at war against the fluffies and the fluffie feminists. Masculists are verbally aggressive. They harangue fluffies and piss on them as vermin.

Masculists shit on fluffie feminists, for their hypocrisy, and push the public and the media to menfair the gender laws, such as in the divorce courts, where alimony needs to be thrown out, because women are all FIPs, and custody of kids is automatically JOINT. The Parer (paternity rejection right) needs to be legislated, so that a man in an unwanted pregnancy can legally reject it, so that if the woman wants to continue with it, she pays the total costs of the kid, which she can do as a FIP.
So you see the enormous importance masculists place on the FIPing of society. With all women FIPs, the gender laws can be made menfair, and if they are not, then the masculists will do what the MGTOWs do, i.e. wipe out whole populations, by rejecting paternity, and marriage.
Women will have a hard time rejecting their evolved biology, i.e. their hypergamy, their judging men by men’s EQs, but women have no choice about this. They are being FORCED to adapt to become anti-hypergamous by being forced by the masculists and a FIP Society in general to become FIPs. A fluffie female will have no future, no respect, no man.
Cheers,
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
profhugodegaris@yahoo.com
https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com