Species Dominance, Artilects, Artilect War, Cosmists, Terrans, Gigadeath, Essays, Media, etc
MGTOWs/masculists have a great deal of power if they choose to use it. This flyer lists and discusses the various forms of this power, to make MGTOWs/masculists conscious of the fact, and then to incorporate that awareness into their daily lives and their behaviors with women, feminists, other men, and society in general.
I’ll begin with a list of the powers that MGTOWs/masculists have, giving each a label, often in the form of an “argument label” and will elaborate on each later. In relation to women, especially fluffies, we have enormous power. We can force fluffies to be FIPs with the “MGTOWs/Masculists Can Force Women to be FIPs” argument. We have the power to hit back hard against the feminists whom most believe that they have a monopoly on gender issues. We MGTOWs/masculists can use the “Hypocrisy of the Fluffie Feminists” argument. We can scare young men into not marrying, not having kids with the “Toxicity of the Fluffie Feminist Controlled Divorce Courts” argument. We can force society and particularly the gender politicians to menfair society and the gender laws with the “Population Annihilation” argument.
These 4 arguments are very strong, and should be part of the consciousness of every MGTOW/masculist. Probably most of you reading this already know some or all of them, but it is useful to bring them together in one powerful MGTOW/masculist package.
1. The “MGTOWs/Masculists Can Force Women to be FIPs” Argument
Nearly all men are socialized and educated to be FIPs (financially independent persons). As males, we don’t have much choice but to go out into the world, since we are genetically incapable of having babies, so what else is there for men to do other than going into the world and trying to manipulate it to our advantage. Since most men are FIPs, we have the power to force women, especially fluffies (traditional women who expect to be able to parasite off the money of a (FIP) man) to become FIPs as well. A fluffie can only be a fluffie if she can manage to get her financial claws into some manslave who is prepared to be parasited upon by his fluffie girlfriend or wife. But experience in Japan with the herbivores and more recently in the US, has shown that men are waking up in droves, and REFUSE to be parasited upon by fluffies. Fluffies are seen more and more by men as immoral, as parasitic, manslaving vermin.
There is real anger coming from men against fluffies, who sit on their fat arses and expect men to “save them” i.e. to pay for them, so that these fluffies can live in a middle class house that he pays for, so that she can raise her kids in it. Women now have the contraceptive pill, and hence can choose reliably the number of kids they want, which is usually 0, 1, or 2, so that they have a career window of some 40+ years.
The masculists point the finger at fluffies saying that “Now that women can work, they MUST work, because anything else is exploitation of the labor of men.” Masculists are Marxists in that sense, lashing out at the labor exploitation, the slavery of men, by women, and are very angry about it, motivating masculists to wipe out fluffiedom, by wiping out fluffies, not by killing them, but totally neglecting them, forcing them to rot on the shelf to extinction.
Masculists/MGTOWs will often not even sex fluffies, as a form of punishment for them being fluffies, putting ENORMOUS moral pressure on fluffies to get off their parasitic arses and become FIPs, getting a FIP major education at high school and university, so that they can earn good money in the market place which values FIP majors (i.e. STEM fields, i.e. math and science based education). There is a long way to go along this path, because today, in most high schools in western countries, the large majority of young women choose to become fluffies by choosing to become fluffie crappers, i.e. studying fluffie crap (i.e. non math, non sciences) that the economy does not value, so pays poorly, so fluffie crappers end up with a worthless diploma, so that in their 30s they realize they don’t have enough earning power to afford a middle class house, so they then start looking around for some manslave to parasite upon, to have him pay for the house so she can have her kids in it.
This parasitic attitude of fluffie crappers, i.e. the large majority of young women, is despised by the MGTOWs/masculists who treat such women, i.e. the large majority of women, young women, as fluffies, as fluffie crappers, who EXPECT to be able to parasite off a man. This attitude of women, most women, is treated with utter contempt by MGTOW/masculists, who lash out at such women. Masculists, who are a lot more political than the a-political, passive MGTOWs, spit at fluffies, refusing to go near them, and will only date and sex with FIP women, and even then not marry them, not give them kids, until the gender laws are made menfair, but that may take decades.
So, since we men are FIPs, we have the power to deny fluffies, fluffie crappers, from parasiting off men’s money, by simply refusing to have anything to do with fluffies, forcing them to rot on the shelf to extinction, i.e. manless, loveless, sexless, babyless, poor and increasingly shunned by a society becoming more informed every year of the massive gender injustice committed against men.
2. The “Hypocrisy of the Fluffie Feminists” Argument.
The feminists feel that they have a monopoly on gender issues, which is ridiculous to MGTOWs/masculists, but most feminists have not heard of MGTOW nor masculism, so by default have not had their masculist consciousness raised. They have had their feminist consciousness raised, lashing out at the lack of equal rights for women in past centuries, but remain largely ignorant regarding the more recent and massive gender injustices committed against men.
Since feminists know nothing about MGTOW/masculism, by default they have traditional attitudes towards men, i.e. fluffie attitudes towards men, i.e. they see men as cash machines, whose purpose on earth is to pay for women to have babies and live in a house that HE pays for.
The MGTOWs/masculists lash out at feminists for being fluffie feminists, because they are still fluffies in their attitudes towards men. These fluffie feminists are hypocrites in the eyes of MGTOWs/masculists because they want to have their cake and to eat it too. They want equal rights with men, i.e. 2nd wave feminism (and I have no problem with equal rights for women. I feel that way, out of a simple sense of justice. If I were a woman, I’d be a 2nd wave feminist) but 3rd wave feminists don’t accept equal obligations with men. They reject the idea that women have a moral obligation to be FIPs, to share the burden of earning the living, and NOT PARASITE OFF A MAN.
This two faced attitude of most feminists makes them hypocrites. Most women have a deeply ingrained attitude that men exist to serve women, to work for women, to be manslaves for women. If a woman senses that some man will give her nothing, she tends to look on him as “useless” for her, i.e. she cannot extract resources/protein/money from him. In other words, women see men as exploitable, and not as human beings.
This idea, that women look on men as exploitable resources, that women only love men conditionally, i.e. provided that she is successfully exploiting him for the benefit of her and her kids, but the moment he loses that exploitability, she will coldly dump him in favor of some more exploitable manslave. This idea is called the “red pill” (i.e. the acceptance of the bitter reality, taken from the movie “The Matrix”) and is the most powerful idea to come from the MGTOWs.
Personally, I despise women who look upon me only as a cash machine. I wrote a flyer which expressed my attitude towards such fluffies that was entitled “I’m more than a cash machine, you bitch!” I get very angry at women who judge me purely in terms of how much money I make or have. I am a human being and hence multifaceted, with strong intellectual and ideational capacities that deserve recognition. If women don’t see that, then they can go fuck themselves, literally. I want nothing to do with such women.
When feminists dump on men in public, at public meetings, then MGTOWs/masculists who are intellectually armed with the “Fluffie Feminists are Hypocrites” argument can use it with venom, to lash back at the feminists, explaining to the audience why MGTOWs/masculists have such contempt for the fluffie parasitic manslaving attitudes of fluffies and especially against the hypocrisy of fluffie feminists who want equal rights with men but reject equal obligations with men, expecting men to keep being cash machines for women.
3. The “Toxicity of the Fluffie Feminist Controlled Divorce Courts” Argument
MGTOWs/masculists need to set up men’s lib groups in every high school and college to teach young men not to marry and not to have kids, because in today’s fluffie feminist dominated divorce court system, divorce has become toxic for men, and hence, so has marriage. Most MGTOWs/masculists are well aware that roughly one married man in four will be financially massacred in the divorce courts in the US and similar western countries.
A divorcing father will lose his kids with 90% probability. He will lose his house that is given by the state, to his ex fluffie wife, so that she can raise HER kids in it. He will be forced to pay child support and if she is a real fluffie, he may be forced to pay her alimony for the rest of her life, with no moral or legal obligation that his fluffie parasitic ex wife be forced to become a FIP and pay for herself.
This financial massacring of divorced fathers, is such a massive gender injustice against men, that already two thirds (70%) of young men in the US and Japan, refuse to marry and have kids, spending their money on themselves. In a decade, that percentage will probably be over 90%. Thus young men are on strike, and waking up in droves to the toxicity of the fluffie feminist dominated divorce court system that treats men only as cash machines.
The unconscious attitude of the fluffie feminists who control the divorce courts is that men are merely exploitable objects, they are not human beings. Their function is only to pay for women to have babies. This attitude of the fluffie feminist divorce courts is truly hated by MGTOWs/masculists, so it is not surprising, that men in huge numbers now are going on strike, refusing to be treated as manslaves for women, by being MGTOWs and masculists.
The toxicity of the divorce courts, and hence marriage, should be a lesson that every man should know about in those countries that have fluffie feminist dominated divorce court systems. This is a massive injustice against men and needs to be removed, to be fought against, because it is a moral abomination. If it is not removed, then eventually, the whole population will get wiped out, which brings me to the strongest argument in the MGTOW/masculist repertoire, the most powerful strategy that the MGTOWs/masculist have.
4. The “Population Annihilation” Argument
The most powerful argument that the MGTOWs/masculists have is their “population annihilation” argument which does as follows – “If society and the gender laws are not made menfair, the MGTOWs/masculists will wipe out whole populations by continuing to reject paternity!”
Governments cannot force men to accept being manslaves to fluffie parasites. They can bachelor-tax them, but there is a limit to that as well. If the tax on MGTOW men is too high, being MGTOW, they can easily uproot themselves and move to another country where the cost of living is much lower and hence see their purchasing power of their savings rise as a result.
The Japanese population is already starting to fall as a result of the Japanese herbivores (the Japanese version of MGTOW). It has fallen by a million is just a few years. In two decades, once the baby boomers have died off, the Japanese population will have fallen to two thirds of its current figure to about 80 million.
This reality in Japan has already set off alarm bells amongst Japanese politicians. Already two State Ministers for population have held office, trying to persuade young Japanese herbivore men to have children, but with no success, because they failed to address the root of the problem, namely the herbivores’ rejection of their fathers’ traditional salary man role, of being manslaves to their fluffie house wives, working 11 hour days, 3 hour commute times, handing over their paychecks to their fluffie house wives. In Japan the husbands overwork, while their fluffie house wives play tennis.
The great power of the “population annihilation” argument is that sooner or later, the gender politicians will be FORCED by a general paternity strike to give men what they want, i.e. gender justice for men, e.g. by making divorce law menfair, throwing out alimony, giving joint custody of the kids by default, encouraging divorcing couples to buy a cheap apartment near the house, in which they alternate weekly, with the father living with the kids in the house one week with the mother in the apartment, and the next week, they swap places. The Parer needs to be brought in (Parer = paternity rejection right) so that a man can reject legally an unwanted pregnancy. He fills is a government form, so that if the woman goes ahead with the pregnancy, then she has full financially responsibility for the costs of the kid. Legal discriminations against men need to be removed across the board.
Having a Parer, will force all women to be FIPs. When the fluffie feminists fight tooth and nail to block the passage of the Parer, the MGTOWs/masculists can slam them with the fluffie feminist hypocrisy argument. Women have the Marer, but men don’t have the Parer, a blatant form of sexual discrimination against men. Girls need to be socialized and educated to be FIPs, to be responsible, adult, career competent, FIPs as women, so that the Parer becomes practical.
Education of young women needs to be revolutionized, so that parents, teachers, professors, put strong moral pressure on women to be FIPs, otherwise fluffie women are punished by being manless, paternity will continue to be rejected by men, and the population continues to crash until the gender politicians are FORCED into more drastic action.
When they do, they will have to listen to the arguments of the MGTOWs/masculists and take men’s gender justice into account, or the MGTOWs/masculists will just continue to reject paternity, and the population continues to fall. Sooner or later, the MGTOWs/masculists must win. We have the enormous power of life or death over the whole population. The gender politicians must create a menfair culture and menfair the gender laws, or within a century there will be no culture left to do anything with.
The population annihilation argument is the strongest that the MGTOWs/masculists have, and should be pushed strongly onto the broadcast media, until it is taken up and everyone knows about it. MGTOWs can use it as the main platform for their politicking, making MGTOWs much more political in their attitudes, instead of their traditional passivity, just quietly walking away from the marriage market and rejecting paternity. With the population annihilation argument, they can politicize themselves, and force society and the gender politicians to menfair the gender laws.
Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis